Speaker
Description
Every population consists of individuals who vary in their traits, and each trait may, or may not, be associated with frailty or fitness. Variation in frailty and fitness traits makes population studies prone to selective depletion bias (SDB). The issue is widespread across fields. When an ageing cohort exhibits declining mortality, is it individuals becoming healthier or selective depletion of the frail? In an epidemic, when growth in cumulative infections decelerates, is it individuals cautiously changing behaviour or selective depletion of the most susceptible? In microbial populations, when mutations increase population vulnerability to stress, it is individuals becoming more vulnerable or mutant populations having higher variance in fitness? In each case, the first explanation invokes individuals changing, while the second recognises that populations change due to selection on pre-existing variation. While the former are intuitive and widely adopted, explanations that rely on selective depletion are more neutral and less commonly considered due to cognitive biases and challenges in estimating all variation that matters.
We propose remodelling selection (ReMS) as a general strategy of study design and analysis to address the SDB problem. We have been using case studies to illustrate how it works but it remains a challenge to formalise ReMS in abstract terms that are broad enough to represent the entire domain of its applicability. Let’s discuss!
